What’s wrong with these Cartoons on the ECI ?

Oct 4, 2026Censorship, Censorship - News Media, Censorship - Social Media

Last Updated on October 4, 2026 by freespeechcollective

Nothing, except that they poke fun at the Election Commission of India (ECI) and call out the mess created by the Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.

Cartoons by Manjul were restricted by Instagram in India.  Manjul posted the notice on his ‘X’ account:

Cartoonish Satush Acharya found that his entire account was restricted in India, without any notice or any redressal mechanism:

Acharya hit back with another cartoon, poking fun at the block, posted on ‘X’:

Manjul took a swipe at the judiciary:

The censored cartoons and the responses were all posted on ‘X’ but they remained unavailable on Instagram.

Other cartoonists, like Sandeep Adhwaryu of The Times of India, posted cartoons in support:

The cartoon, taking a dig at Prime Minister Modi’s recent appearance at a ‘bhajan clubbing’ session in Delhi, prompted a comment from Manjul, who said : “Spot on, Sandeep. If you want to enjoy Freedom of Expression, join the bhajan clubbing and sing bhajans and perform kirtan in praise of Mr Non-Biological.”

Sanitary Panels went a step ahead and bluntly showcased the current regime, complete with a clownish saffron nose and bow-tie :

It was a riot of cartoons. And with so many likes and shares on social media, everyone joined the party.

But the lack of accountability or transparency by the Meta-owned Instagram is disturbing, as also its mechanism for grievance redressal or restoration of censored content. In a statement, the digital rights group, Software Freedom Law Centre, India, said :

“The increasing trend of censorship of cartoons and political humour is deeply concerning, particularly because it points to a shrinking space for dissent in India. The right to freedom of speech and expression is a fundamental right, and the ability to question, criticise and even ridicule those in power is an essential part of a democratic society. Dissent may be uncomfortable for governments, but discomfort cannot be the basis for silencing it.”

SFLC called upon Meta to remove the restrictions on the two cartoonists and called upon the government to “provide greater transparency about the legal and policy basis for content restrictions on cartoons and satirical content. “

 

Censorship

“Censorship” tracks incidents where the government or authorities engage in suppression and prohibition of speech, action, writing, and so on, under various pretexts, including “harmful material” “threat to society”.

Related

Section 66A and other legal zombies IFF Research Series, Working Paper No. 2, November 2018 Despite the striking down of Sec 66A by the Supreme Court of India in March 2015, it continues to be in use by police across the country.  In this important report, Abhinav Sekhri & Apar Gupta, research and discuss how […] Read More
Virtually every day, important social media platforms like Facebook, Youtube and Twitter clamp down on news and views put out by independent news sites. These social media networks take refuge in ‘official’ communication, government orders or police directives and guidelines. Do these social media behemoths actually end up silencing voices of dissent? How valid are […] Read More
A FreeMuse report Alankrita Shrivastava’s film Lipstick Under My Burkha was initially denied release in India for being “lady oriented”, Icelandic artist Borghildur Indriðadóttir had her Facebook friends and photos deleted after she shared a promo of her photo exhibition Demoncrazy featuring topless women, and Afghan playwright and actor Monirah Hashemi received death threats for […] Read More