Mamata meme: BJP worker gets bail, is told to apologise in writing

May 15, 2019Censorship - Social Media

Last Updated on November 3, 2024 by freespeechcollective

The Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed bail to Priyanka Sharma, the BJP youth wing worker who had circulated a morphed photograph of Priyanka Chopra with Mamata Banerjee’s head on it, but asked her to apologise in writing after her release.

The vacation bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Indira Banerjee observed that freedom of speech ends when it infringes upon others’ rights.

Twenty-five-year-old Sharma was arrested on May 10 under Section 500 (defamation) of the Indian Penal Code.

Hearing the matter on Tuesday, the bench had initially kept bail conditional to the written apology by Sharma. The court later called back Sharma’s lawyer, senior advocate Neeraj Kishan Kaul, and said the bail would be granted anyway.

When the bench asked if Sharma was willing to apologise, Kaul said it would have a “chilling” effect on free speech. There have been so many caricatures and cartoons of BJP leaders, but nothing happened in those instances, the lawyer pointed out, adding that a meme is just political satire.

But Justice Banerjee said that “freedom of expression is non-negotiable but it cannot encroach on the rights of another”. The bench said “it is wrong to put one’s face on to some other person”.

The bench also said that because Sharma belonged to a political party, the other side may be offended.

Read more here

Related

Section 66A and other legal zombies IFF Research Series, Working Paper No. 2, November 2018 Despite the striking down of Sec 66A by the Supreme Court of India in March 2015, it continues to be in use by police across the country.  In this important report, Abhinav Sekhri & Apar Gupta, research and discuss how […] Read More
Virtually every day, important social media platforms like Facebook, Youtube and Twitter clamp down on news and views put out by independent news sites. These social media networks take refuge in ‘official’ communication, government orders or police directives and guidelines. Do these social media behemoths actually end up silencing voices of dissent? How valid are […] Read More
A FreeMuse report Alankrita Shrivastava’s film Lipstick Under My Burkha was initially denied release in India for being “lady oriented”, Icelandic artist Borghildur Indriðadóttir had her Facebook friends and photos deleted after she shared a promo of her photo exhibition Demoncrazy featuring topless women, and Afghan playwright and actor Monirah Hashemi received death threats for […] Read More